Re: db_recovery_dest pointing to 100Tb file system
- From: hrishy <hrishys@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Howard Latham <howard.latham@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:49:16 +0000 (GMT)
Hi Howard
Thank you very much i appreciate the quick response.
regards
--- On Fri, 15/1/10, Howard Latham <howard.latham@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Howard Latham <howard.latham@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: db_recovery_dest pointing to 100Tb file system
To: hrishys@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Friday, 15 January, 2010, 14:47
Shortest Reply ever! 1 is best because you know always know where it is going
and no config changes will be required. - The only only downside is if the
recovery area goes off line. If you only have 1 then you have a singe point of
failure - bit of a no no.But I if you have space on your server for a temporary
area in case of failure then I would still go for 1 Very big recovery area.
2010/1/15 Howard Latham <howard.latham@xxxxxxxxx>
1
2010/1/15 hrishy <hrishys@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi
I have a 25TB database for which i need to configure a recoery area.
is it advisable to configure a single filesystem of 100Tb as recovery area or
configure 5-8 filesystems adding to 100Tb .
--
Howard A. Latham
--
Howard A. Latham
Other related posts:
