A colleague asked this question in a SR (it was all about 11.2.0.1 Grid Infrastructure) ... from Oracle® Database Storage Administrator's Guide: Chapter 3 >>begin quote To connect to a local Oracle ASM instance with SQL*Plus, set the ORACLE_SID environment variable to the Oracle ASM system identifier (SID). The default Oracle ASM SID for a single-instance database is +ASM, and the default SID for Oracle ASM for an Oracle RAC node is +ASMnode_number where node_number is the number of the node. The ORACLE_HOME environment variable must be set to the Grid Infrastructure home where Oracle ASM was installed. Note: Oracle recommends that you do not change the default Oracle ASM SID name. <<end quote Last setence lets me assume that it is not recommended but possible! Can you explain, please. This is important for us to distinguish ASM instances globally. ... and the answer was: That statement does not necessarily mean it's possible. It's possible in 11.1 and 10g as in Note 744932.1 - How to rename ASM instances in RAC or clustered environment. I actually confirmed with DEV about this for before I gave you the answer. Unfortunately, DEV said changing ASM instance name is NOT even supported. You can consider filing an enhancement request if needed. Note 214168.1 Ext/Pub Logging an Enhancement Request To answer Marks question: In prior versions we gave each ASM an unique name according to the hostname (which is totally unique within our company). As we have several clusters, we still could identify each ASM-instance, logfile etc easily. Now (with 11.2) we have several ASM1, ASM2 and must match them to the corresponding node/clustername with some more effort. For me this is a step backwards, especially as this Feature worked fine in previous versions. Martin Am 16.11.2010 um 08:22 schrieb Robert Bialek: > For versions < 11.2 it works. From 11.2 you need to use the > default name +ASM[n] (customized names are simply ignored) > > Cheers, > Robert > > On 11/16/2010 06:45 AM, Bobak, Mark wrote: >> >> Personally, I’ve never done it. I’d expect it to work. >> >> But, I have to ask, why bother? Why the added (unnecessary?) complexity? >> >> -Mark >> >> From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> On Behalf Of K R >> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 7:35 PM >> To: Oracle-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: customized asm instance name >> >> All, >> >> I am planning to use customized ASM name +ASM_XP0053 ( where xp0053 is the >> server name) instead of the default +ASM >> >> Does this have any disadvantage . >> >> thanks in advance >> >> regards >> Kart >