Re: cost
- From: Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 18:48:21 -0600
I get the same result (higher cost hash join chosen over NL join) with
Oracle 8.1.7.4.1
At 01:28 PM 4/5/2004, you wrote:
>My guess would be that this is a deliberate
>heuristic introduced some time around 9
>to avoid nested loop full tablescans when
>the numbers are small.
Wolfgang Breitling
Oracle7, 8, 8i, 9i OCP DBA
Centrex Consulting Corporation
http://www.centrexcc.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
