RE: compelling arguments for a ThirdParty Cluster
- From: "Oliver Jost" <Oliver.Jost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <hrishys@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Oracle-L" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:09:12 -0500
Data can be protected in a number of ways, including RAID... You can
have the data redundancy set using external and internal (mirroring
using Oracle or another means... Oracle uses stripes of 1MB across
whatever devices you present... e.g. Oracle can stripe across your RAID
creating the equivalent of a plaid). I was more mentioning the
protection of data in reference to node failure (CRS)... There is an
entire process of checking Oracle uses to manage the latest, greatest
block during failure and synchronization of the global cache. Your
concern was loss/corruption of data when there is a failure. You can
check Metalink document 144152.1 for details (9i RAC) on recovery, it
is nicely detailed and from what I've gathered from Oracle has not
changed too much between 9i and 10G.
Oliver
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of hrishy
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 12:55 PM
To: Oliver Jost; Oracle-L
Subject: RE: compelling arguments for a ThirdParty Cluster
Hi Oliver
Thanks for the reassurance.
By data protection you mean raid.
regards
Hrishy
___________________________________________________________
Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with Yahoo! For
Good http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
