Hi, It is not to true to say you cannot do a rolling clusterware upgrade. This is very much possible. Here is a link to performing a rolling clusterware upgrade from 10.2.0.3 -> 10.2.0.4: https://jarneil.wordpress.com/2008/06/23/rolling-oracle-clusterware-upgrade-to-10204/ You can also see from there how to do a 10.2.0.3 to 11.1.0.6 clusterware upgrade in a rolling fashion. Where you get the problem is that ASM is not rolling until 11.1, however this should not prevent clusterware itself being upgraded in a rolling fashion at 10gR2. cheers, jason. -- http://blog.jarneil.co.uk On 2 Feb 2011, at 21:42, Upendra N wrote: > I don't believe you can do a rolling upgrade of clusterware until 11.2.0.1. > http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e17128/chapter1.htm#NEWFTCH1 > > -Upendra > > > > From: eglewis71@xxxxxxxxx > To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: clusterware upgrade question > Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:05:32 -0500 > > Hi, > I'm getting ready to upgrade our current cluster > from 10.2.0.4 to 10.2.0.5 (Solaris 64-bit). > The components being upgraded include > clusterware, RAC, ASM, RDBMS , and Dataguard. > > In regard to the clusterware, we have a 2 node cluster. > In the patch notes, it states that all Oracle database instances > on all cluster nodes, must be shut down before applying the > clusterware patch. Later on in the notes, it states that a > rolling upgrade for the clusterware can be done. I'm seeing > conflcting messages here. > I've done rolling upgrades before with patch sets, but not with an > upgrade. > I've contacted Oracle support about this,but they were of little help. > > Can the clusterware upgrade be done in a rolling fashion ? > > In regard to Dataguard. We have physical standby, 2 - node cluster. > From what I understand, the physical standby should be upgraded before > the primary database (in this case a cluster). Once that is done, the > primary environment is then upgraded. > Does the primary need to be upgraded at the same time ? Can it > be upgraded a day or a week later ? > > thanks > > ed >