Re: automatic extent allocation
- From: Jared Still <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Steven Patenaude <spatenau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:44:28 -0800
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:55:03 -0600, Steven Patenaude <spatenau@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:37:22 -0800, Jared Still <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > So, why extent limits determined with a 31 bit number?
> >
> > Rather than a 32 bit one that is.
> >
> > --
> > Jared Still
> > Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
>
> Signed vs unsigned, I assume.
>
Well, I did think of that, but couldn't come up with a good
reason for a negative number of extents.
--
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
