There are things on sun's website about zfs with DBs, it does not seem to be good at handling this type of I/O. On 9/24/07, Joe Frohne <joe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello, > > Have you or your admins had the time to figure out why it's performing > poorly? > > There are some docs around, but not much yet. > > I think this all points towards it being something nice to look at in a > development/test environment. We are really looking at it for the > capability to do snapshots in hopes that we can move our test > environment off of our EMC cabinet to drop the maintenance cost of that. > > Thank you to all who replied! > > Joe Frohne > > Connor McDonald wrote: > > One of the servers here is running Oracle, and the sys admins (keen as > they > > are) thought "Gee, there's a cool idea...lets go ZFS"...at which point > > performance has dropped through the floor. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: > oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > On Behalf Of Joe Frohne > > Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2007 11:08 PM > > To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: ZFS & Oracle > > > > Hello, > > > > I searched the archives for general ZFS information and found a few > threads > > about ZFS and snapshots. These threads are about a year old. I am > > wondering if there is any general impression of running Oracle 10.2.xunder > > ZFS today. Are people doing it successfully? What are the good, the > bad > > and the ugly of running Oracle under ZFS? > > > > Regards, > > > > Joe Frohne > > > > -- > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l > > > > > > -- > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l > > > > > > -- > //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l > > >