RE: XML databases
- From: Michael Thomas <mhthomas@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 10:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
There are some upset customers waiting on the next
version of SQL Server, for sure. Just like happened on
version 7. Never learn, do we? I don't care, because I
like Oracle's database. :-)
And, come on guys, be optimisic (e.g. Do as I say, not
as I do...), etc. As M$ says, "you never know what
will come out next, so get a subscription now. Its our
money anyhow. We're trustworthy." (IMHO)
M$' best XML database (to date) has a current version
and its called MS Access 2003. ;-)
Regards,
Mike Thomas
(Note: Weekend humor intended).
--- Richard Ji <Richard.Ji@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> True, but it is the latest that MS is offering since
>
...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jacques Kilchoer
> [mailto:Jacques.Kilchoer@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Fri 5/7/2004 8:38 PM
> To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc:
> Subject: RE: XML databases
>
> To be fair, they are comparing a just-released
> version of Oracle with a
> version of SQL Server that is almost four years
> old.
...
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
