The draft that I started writing began "Rich so using your query gives me 1.3gb/s for the last 105 days on a tiny little 11.2.0.3 db that is used only for development. Given that this statistic only appears in our 11.2.0.3 db I'd be cautious of using it. " :) On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Rich Jesse < rjoralist2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Martijn writes: > > > I'm on 11.2.0.1 on redhat(5). > > When executing this query I get no rows returned. > > > > Looking into v$statname I noticed this statistic is not there. > > Also the (online) documentation (11.2) didn't reveal much. > > Interesting! I don't have that version installed, but I see in 10.2 XE > that > the names are substantially different from 11.2.0.3. > > Not that this helps you though. :( But now I wonder how folks who use > those views for monitoring deal with the change... > > Rich > > -- > //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l > > > -- Niall Litchfield Oracle DBA http://www.orawin.info -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l