Re: What I saw at Open World 2009

  • From: Ravi Gaur <ravigaur1@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: robertgfreeman@xxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:30:17 -0500

I tried to pick a few things on the Sunday Keynote address.
Thought that was interesting.

- Ravi

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Robert Freeman <robertgfreeman@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> I posted what I thought was a funny picture on my blog....
> Robert G. Freeman
> Oracle ACE
> Ask me about on-site Oracle Training! RMAN, DBA, Tuning, you name it!
> Author:
> Oracle Database 11g RMAN Backup and Recovery (Oracle Press) - ON IT'S WAY
> OCP: Oracle Database 11g Administrator Certified Professional Study Guide
> (Sybex)
> Oracle Database 11g New Features (Oracle Press)
> Oracle Database 10g New Features (Oracle Press)
> Other various titles
> Blog:
> ------------------------------
> *From:* "Allen, Brandon" <Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> *To:* "jkstill@xxxxxxxxx" <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>; Oracle-L Freelists <
> oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Sent:* Wed, October 14, 2009 4:00:23 PM
> *Subject:* RE: What I saw at Open World 2009
>  Thanks for sharing Jared.  It sounds like the DBA 2.0 presentation was
> pretty misleading.  I agree with your assessment on the validity of their
> tests (based solely on your notes – I didn’t attend the presentation).  The
> other big problem I find with “DBA 2.0s” is that they can be completely
> clueless when their GUI doesn’t work, e.g. they don’t know what v$ views to
> look at, how to run RMAN, exp/imp, or datapump, how to format SQL*Plus
> output, etc.  I try to be neither a 1.0 nor a 2.0, but a combination of both
> – using either the command-line or the GUI depending on which one is better
> suited for the task at hand.
> Regards,
> Brandon
> ------------------------------
> Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or
> attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not
> consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions
> and other information in this message that do not relate to the official
> business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed
> by it.

Other related posts: