Matt, have you checked v$transaction to see you have any several day old
transaction such as caused by a dead front-end application where the Oracle
session process is still in existence?
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf
of Matt Adams <MAdams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 3:23:58 PM
To: Oracle L
Subject: Weird ORA-1555 error
I've seen ORA-1555 (snapshot too old) lots of times in the past and they always
seemed to be caused by 1 of 2 scenarios.
Either an image of a block needed by a long running query is not available
because another session has modified and committed a change to the block and
the 'before modification' image of the block is no longer available in the
rollback segments. (common) Or it's a delayed block cleanout issue where the
ITL in the block header needs maintenance. (uncommon, but not exceedingly rare)
I'm now getting an ORA-1555 error that doesn't seem to fit either case.
This particular table is roughly 11 million rows in a database 10 terrabytes in
size and not terrible busy. There's 300 Gig of undo tablespace and
UNDO_RETENTION is set for 40 hours. (don't ask why 40 hours. I didn't set it
up that way and nobody seems to remember why it was set that way)
Running the following query returns an error in anywhere from 2 to 10 seconds.
SQL> select count(*) from app_owner.type_history;
select count(*) from hri1_owner.type_history
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01555: snapshot too old: rollback segment number 491 with name
"_SYSSMU491_93190984$" too small
The error is repeatable, with the same rollback segment (number 491) listed
Since I'm getting this error in sometimes as little as 2 seconds or so, the
first scenario I described above doesn't seem to apply.
Usually, the recommended action to eliminate problems with delayed block
cleanout is to either gather stats on the table or do a 'select * from table'
to force oracle to visit every block. That doesn't seem to be working here.
All attempts to analyze the table or select count(*) from the table get the
same ORA-1555 error
This is v 126.96.36.199 (EE) on solaris.
Searches on the web and metalink (yes, I still call it that) have proven
fruitless so far.
Anybody have any thoughts on why this might be occurring?
**** This communication may contain privileged and/or confidential information.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that disclosing,
copying, or distributing of the contents is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this message in error, please contact the sender immediately and
destroy any copies of this document. ****