Re: Veritas Backupexec vs. Networker
- From: "Gene Sais" <Gsais@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <Paula_Stankus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 10:24:11 -0400
Just a thought. I backup to disk from midnight to 6am all databases.
The SysAdmin picks the backups from disk starting at 6am. I only need
the tape copy when I need an older version. I rarely go to tape. Using
this method, I maintain control of schedules, backups, restores, etc.
The SysAdmins love it. Disk storage is cheap. I do this for 27
databases on 100gb storage.
BTW, we also left Legato for TSM. Not sure if the grass is greener on
the other side :).
>>> <Paula_Stankus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 9/17/2004 9:02:04 AM >>>
Guys,
Our system admins. are considering Vertias Backupexec for the Oracle =
backups which we have been doing with RMAN and Networker. We basically
=
use Networker solely for media management and the system admins. manage
=
that part. All of the scheduling and mainta. is done by dba's and
using =
Oracle, crontab, RMAN. The weakest link consistently has been =
Networker, tapes...
Now they are considering Veritas Backupexec. Can that be setup just to
=
be a link in the same way Networker has. I am concerned with having
the =
system admins. take over this part as again RMAN has been the stable =
part of the backups. Plus I have heard some things about the Veritas
=
Backupexec for SQL Server not working reliably with large backups.
Any opinions?
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
