"Explain Plan Lies".
"Explain Plan Will Lie More Frequently In 12c".
12c has more Adaptives, more Evolutions.
Look at actual runtime statistics for the SQL, for multiple executions of the
SQL to see if it is adapting / evolving !
NUM_ROWS may be the same. If you did Export-Import, CLUSTERING_FACTOR may be
different.
System Statistics may be different.
Cost in Gs and Ts would normally mean something drastic. In the old days it
would be a missing join. I presume you are sure that the submitted SQLs are
exactly the same in SIT and PROD. Did you compare the 10053 Traces in SIT and
PROD and identify the differences ?
Hemant K Chitale
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Tiwari, Yogesh
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 1:33 PM
To: 'oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Cc: Tiwari, Yogesh
Subject: Two 12.1.0.2 database show different cost calculations mechanism for
same query
Hi,
We recently upgraded to 12.1.0.2 from 11.2.0.3 on linux x86-64. Apart from all
kinds of perf issues that we are fixing/struggling with, I found another
strange behaviour.
Same query that runs in SIT env, has cost in few Gs, while same query in UAT
has cost of few thousands. I went through 10053 trace, and found query in SIT
is using additional CPU costing, along with IO costing, while same query in UAT
is only using IO costing (akin to 11g) mechanism.
All tables involved are same, in both DBs, and have almost (99%) same num_rows.
Are we hitting some bug? Is it expected behaviour?
In same UAT for other queries(ones we investigated as part of perf issues), we
see they too have huge cost compared to 11g cost. Huge here means, 11g cost was
in few thousands, and 12c cost is in Gs and Ts :(
---Same patches are applied in SIT and UAT--- This is a DWH system
$ORACLE_HOME/OPatch/opatch lspatches
18747342;
18961555;
21463894;
19141838;
20877664;
18966843;
21611406;OCW Interim patch for 21611406
19509982;
20373598;
21068507;Database PSU 12.1.0.2.4, Oracle JavaVM Component (Jul2015)
20831110;Database Patch Set Update : 12.1.0.2.4 (20831110)
This email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If
you are not the intended recipient, please delete all copies and notify the
sender immediately. You may wish to refer to the incorporation details of
Standard Chartered PLC, Standard Chartered Bank and their subsidiaries at
https://www.sc.com/en/incorporation-details.html
---
Thanks,
Yogi | Technical Specialist - Databases | Fidelity International
FIL India Business Services Private Limited
5th Floor, Tower - D, Unitech Cyber Park,
Sector 39, Gurgaon 122 002, Haryana, India.
T: +91 124 412 3656 | I: 8 779 3656 | E:
yogesh.tiwari@xxxxxxx<mailto:yogesh.tiwari@xxxxxxx>
Disclaimer: The information transmitted is intended for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential, privileged or copyrighted
material or attorney work product. If you receive this in error, please contact
the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any comments or
statements made are not necessarily those of FIL India Business Services
Private Limited or any other Fidelity entity. All e-mails may be monitored or
recorded.
This email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If
you are not the intended recipient, please delete all copies and notify the
sender immediately. You may wish to refer to the incorporation details of
Standard Chartered PLC, Standard Chartered Bank and their subsidiaries at
https://www.sc.com/en/incorporation-details.html
