Greetings, I am looking at a two node rac cluster running on 32-bit RHEL4, oracle 10.2.0.3.0 SE and am puzzled by a discrepancy in the description of the library and system as listed in the V$ASM_DISK view in the ASM instance. The ASM and RDBMS are installed in separate homes. On node 1 I see the following... [root@spenser init.d]# ./oracleasm listdisks VOL1 VOL2 VOL3 SQL> select library,path from v$asm_disk order by path; LIBRARY PATH ---------------------------------------- System /dev/raw/raw1 System /dev/raw/raw10 System /dev/raw/raw2 System /dev/raw/raw3 System /dev/raw/raw5 System /dev/raw/raw6 System /dev/raw/raw7 System /dev/raw/raw8 System /dev/raw/raw9 On node 2 I see the following... [root@hawk init.d]# ./oracleasm listdisks VOL1 VOL2 VOL3 SQL> select library,path from v$asm_disk order by path; LIBRARY PATH --------------------------- System /dev/raw/raw1 System /dev/raw/raw10 System /dev/raw/raw2 System /dev/raw/raw3 System /dev/raw/raw5 System /dev/raw/raw6 System /dev/raw/raw7 System /dev/raw/raw8 System /dev/raw/raw9 ASM Library - Generic Linux, version 2.0.2 (KABI_V2) ORCL:VOL1 ASM Library - Generic Linux, version 2.0.2 (KABI_V2) ORCL:VOL2 ASM Library - Generic Linux, version 2.0.2 (KABI_V2) ORCL:VOL3 As I understand it when the library is listed as system it means that the asm_diskstring parameter is not set correctly. The puzzling thing is that in the instance on each node it is set to null. The asm_diskgroup parameter is set the same on each node, 'ASMGRP1, ASMGRP2'. I don't understand what might have caused these to differ. If anyone can assist I would appreciate it. Thanks. Bill Wagman Univ. of California at Davis IET Campus Data Center wjwagman@xxxxxxxxxxx (530) 754-6208 -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l