RE: Teradata article about exadata
- From: "Stephens, Chris" <Chris.Stephens@xxxxxxx>
- To: "'oracledbaquestions@xxxxxxxxx'" <oracledbaquestions@xxxxxxxxx>, 'ORACLE-L' <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 08:19:35 -0600
SGA/buffer cache and all the locks/latches/mutexes necessary to coordinate
access to those buffers.
Teradata doesn't implement acid as far as I know.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dba DBA
[oracledbaquestions@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:oracledbaquestions@xxxxxxxxx>]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 11:02 PM Central Standard Time
To: ORACLE-L
Subject: Teradata article about exadata
This is a marketing article. I have not used teradata or exadata. I think
Teradata is basically Oracle running on custom hardware sold by Oracle that is
specialized for DB performance.�
anyone know what they mean by "shared disk"? Its on page 2.�
I'd like to avoid an oracle fan argument. I know people who have used teradata
and find it a very a good product.�
www.teradata.com/white-papers/Exadata-is-Still-Oracle/
While Exadata improves Oracle�s I/O performance, Exadata
does not tackle Oracle�s underlying performance and scalability
problems with large-scale data warehousing that stem from
its shared disk architectural foundation.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is
not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering
this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us
immediately by email reply.
Other related posts:
