RE: Storage array advice anyone?
- From: mkb <mkb125@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:06:15 -0800 (PST)
Um...yeah
I hope that wasn't a rhetorical question?
--- "Post, David (Corporate)" <Dave.Post@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> In addition to the failure probabilities human error
> while attempting to fix
> the array can lose all your data. Ever had a tech
> pull out the a working
> drive instead of the failed drive?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jared Still [mailto:jkstill@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 4:58 PM
> To: chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Stephen.Lee@xxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Storage array advice anyone?
>
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:47:20 +0000,
> chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > My experience is that with either RAID 5 or 10 you
> have to be unbelievably
> > unlucky to lose data providing disks are replaced
> when they fail and not
> left
> > for a few days or even more. You are talking
> extremely remote. It might be
> an
> > idea to get someone to do the maths and work out
> the probabilities.
>
> I, for one, have been that unlucky on at least one
> occasion.
>
> --
> Jared Still
> Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
All your favorites on one personal page ? Try My Yahoo!
http://my.yahoo.com
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
