RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- From: "Kevin Closson" <kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 14:53:15 -0700
...ok, I want to steer this yet again onto a different runway
if I may. What if, just consider for a moment, that you could create
a filesystem (CFS) snapshot with no interruption every 2 seconds ( yes,
I'm talking about filesystem COW snapshots to the tune of well
over 100,000 supported per filesystem) throughout an entire production
day and pick any of those to be the new read/write filesystem and expire
all others in one fell swoop?
>>back from DR DC to main DC, whilst the rest is replicating from main
DC to DR DC? How easy is that? Can the DBA initiate that him/herself, or
is there the need of getting Storage Admins and/or System Admins
involved? I dislike dependencies like that.
...yes, DR that requires both storage admins and DBAs is very
distastefull
to me as well...
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
- » Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » Re: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » Re: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » Re: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » Re: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » Re: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » Re: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » Re: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?
- » RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?