RE: Solaris 10g executables - perrmissions
- From: "Lex de Haan" <lex.de.haan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <GJohnson@xxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 18:48:14 +0200
excuse me if I am asking the obvious -- but was your umask setting OK when you
installed Oracle 10g?
how are the permission settings of the SQL*Loader and SQL*Plus executables?
kind regards,
Lex.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Adams Seminar http://www.naturaljoin.nl/events/seminars.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Johnson, George
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 16:39
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Solaris 10g executables - perrmissions
We are setting up 10g and testing upgrades from our 9i databases.
One of the strange quirks I have noticed is that the default permissions on the
10g software are a lot tighter than previous versions.
We have several auto-loader type users with very limited OS privileges,
they can no longer execute SQL*Plus and sqlldr, under 10g, but can still access
the 9i executables OK. Has anyone else run into this problem on the Solaris
platform? Looks like only members of dba group can now access the software, I
not going to grant dba just to get access to sqlplus.
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:de Haan;Lex
FN:Lex de Haan
ORG:Natural Join B.V.
TEL;WORK;VOICE:+31.30.2515022
TEL;HOME;VOICE:+31.30.2518795
TEL;CELL;VOICE:+31.62.2955714
TEL;WORK;FAX:+31.30.2523366
ADR;WORK:;;Pieter Breughelstraat 10;Utrecht;;3583 SK;Netherlands
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Pieter Breughelstraat 10=0D=0AUtrecht 3583
SK=0D=0ANetherlands
URL;WORK:http://www.naturaljoin.nl
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:lex.de.haan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
REV:20040224T160439Z
END:VCARD
Other related posts:
