Re: Shareplex
- From: Kurt Van Meerbeeck <kurtvm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: kylelf@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 08:34:49 +0200 (CEST)
Now it's getting interesting ;-)
So what would be a fair price for such a product ? There are only a handful of
competitors I know of :
- Quest Shareplex
- Oracle Golden Gate
- IBM CDC ( http://www-01.ibm.com/software/data/infosphere/change-data-capture/
)
- Tungsten replicator ( http://www.continuent.com/solutions/tungsten-replicator
) - i believe their oracle logminer is not opensource
Anyone using these products and know about their license price ?
cheers,
K
----- Originele e-mail -----
Van: "kyle Hailey" <kylelf@xxxxxxxxx>
Aan: "mcdonald connor" <mcdonald.connor@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "oracle-l-freelists" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Verzonden: Dinsdag 2 augustus 2011 06:49:55 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlijn /
Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Wenen
Onderwerp: Re: Shareplex
Shareplex is cheeper than Goldengate?!
Everyone in this thread has been saying how expensive Shareplex is.
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Connor McDonald < mcdonald.connor@xxxxxxxxx >
wrote:
Why would someone choose Shareplex over Goldengate?
$20K per cpu might be a reason :-)
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:58 AM, kyle Hailey < kylelf@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
Goldengate vs Shareplex
Why would someone choose Shareplex over Goldengate?
just curious, not really in the market.
- Kyle
http://dboptimizer.com
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Vishal Gupta < vishal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:
I have used Shareplex in past back in 9i and 10g days when Oracle AQ could
scale up to replicate 10-15million transaction/day and still keep data latency
low. Shareplex was great for Oracle to Oracle replication. I dont know about
the price though.
If you are looking for something cross RDBMS, then you could also go for
GoldenGate.
On 27 Jul 2011, at 17:07, Amaral, Rui wrote:
> We had it at my previous employer a few years ago as well. It worked but
> expensive and a bit of a memory hog in our environment.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ]
> On Behalf Of Bill Ferguson
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 12:05 PM
> To: RStorey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: oracle-l-freelists
> Subject: Re: Shareplex
>
> Tried it several years ago and finally dropped it. It was SUPER
> expensive, and we (myself and the Quest folks) could never get it to
> work correctly with Oracle 10g and Windows 2003 Server. Everything
> they tried still failed, so after spending $65K on it and over a year
> of effort, we dropped it.
>
> You are also prety much correct in what it does, though the setup for
> it was far less than dataguard.
>
> --
> -- Bill Ferguson
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
> NOTICE: Confidential message which may be privileged. Unauthorized
> use/disclosure prohibited. If received in error, please go to
> www.td.com/legal for instructions.
> AVIS : Message confidentiel dont le contenu peut être privilégié.
> Utilisation/divulgation interdites sans permission. Si reçu par erreur,
> prière d'aller au www.td.com/francais/avis_juridique pour des instructions.
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
Connor McDonald
===========================
email: connor_mcdonald@xxxxxxxxx
web: http://www.oracledba.co.uk
"Semper in excremento, sole profundum qui variat"
Other related posts:
