Re: Shareplex
- From: Vishal Gupta <vishal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "kylelf@xxxxxxxxx" <kylelf@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 07:53:30 +0100
Shareplex being expensive doea not make GoldenGate cheaper?
Cheers,
Vishal
On 2 Aug 2011, at 05:51, "kyle Hailey" <kylelf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Shareplex is cheeper than Goldengate?!
>
> Everyone in this thread has been saying how expensive Shareplex is.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Connor McDonald <mcdonald.connor@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> Why would someone choose Shareplex over Goldengate?
>
> $20K per cpu might be a reason :-)
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:58 AM, kyle Hailey <kylelf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Goldengate vs Shareplex
> Why would someone choose Shareplex over Goldengate?
>
> just curious, not really in the market.
>
> - Kyle
> http://dboptimizer.com
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Vishal Gupta <vishal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I have used Shareplex in past back in 9i and 10g days when Oracle AQ could
> scale up to replicate 10-15million transaction/day and still keep data
> latency low. Shareplex was great for Oracle to Oracle replication. I dont
> know about the price though.
>
> If you are looking for something cross RDBMS, then you could also go for
> GoldenGate.
>
>
> On 27 Jul 2011, at 17:07, Amaral, Rui wrote:
>
> > We had it at my previous employer a few years ago as well. It worked but
> > expensive and a bit of a memory hog in our environment.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of Bill Ferguson
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 12:05 PM
> > To: RStorey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: oracle-l-freelists
> > Subject: Re: Shareplex
> >
> > Tried it several years ago and finally dropped it. It was SUPER
> > expensive, and we (myself and the Quest folks) could never get it to
> > work correctly with Oracle 10g and Windows 2003 Server. Everything
> > they tried still failed, so after spending $65K on it and over a year
> > of effort, we dropped it.
> >
> > You are also prety much correct in what it does, though the setup for
> > it was far less than dataguard.
> >
> > --
> > -- Bill Ferguson
> > --
> > //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
> >
> >
> >
> > NOTICE: Confidential message which may be privileged. Unauthorized
> > use/disclosure prohibited. If received in error, please go to
> > www.td.com/legal for instructions.
> > AVIS : Message confidentiel dont le contenu peut être privilégié.
> > Utilisation/divulgation interdites sans permission. Si reçu par erreur,
> > prière d'aller au www.td.com/francais/avis_juridique pour des instructions.
> > --
> > //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
> >
> >
>
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Connor McDonald
> ===========================
> email: connor_mcdonald@xxxxxxxxx
> web: http://www.oracledba.co.uk
>
> "Semper in excremento, sole profundum qui variat"
>
Other related posts:
