Re: Shared Server vs. Connection Pooling

  • From: Tim Gorman <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 07:51:22 -0700

When the application is busy, was written in CGI scripts, and nobody will
update it to use connection pooling.

Shared server is a last resort to accommodate poorly-built applications.


on 2/9/04 6:10 AM, ryan.gaffuri@xxxxxxx at ryan.gaffuri@xxxxxxx wrote:

> My shop is using connection pooling. It seems like the trend is towards middle
> tier connection pooling and away from Shared Server. What do you think? Anyone
> know any cases where Shared Server is a superior option to  middle tier
> connection pooling(other than the reduction in cost)?
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
> --
> Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
> FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
> -----------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts: