Well you could try the following from our upper management on for size: " All, We want to push postgres SQL as the primary DB of choice for all new applications. We should add a notation in the IDLC stating such and should push back on anyone who wishes to use Oracle or SQL. If the requirement is such that Oracle/MSSQL is needed, then we can acquiesce, but if there is no hard requirement for these DB's them PG SQL should be our defacto standard. -Best regards," Richard Goulet Senior Oracle DBA/NA TEAM Lead -----Original Message----- From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Niall Litchfield Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 11:12 AM To: rjoralist2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: ORACLE-L Subject: Re: Semi-OT: MS DB != Oracle DB I expect the pluggable database sales pitch has very similar text in it for 12c,. On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Rich Jesse < rjoralist2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Gah! Going through licensing for budgeting and I came across this tripe: > > http://bit.ly/10MSud5 > > Full link: > > > http://download.microsoft.com/download/0/A/F/0AFA3A2D-827B-4A39-A2D4-9 > 907AAA391CA/Alinean_SQL_Server_and_Oracle_TCA_Study.pdf > > ...which claims: > > "...the corresponding annual cost for administration for these two > databases comes out to $1,605 per year per database for Microsoft SQL > Server and > $7,385 per year per database for Oracle Database..." > > Of course, they neglect to define "database", which is drastically > different between the two platforms. > > I hate budgeting. > > Rich > > -- > //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l > > > -- Niall Litchfield Oracle DBA http://www.orawin.info -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l