Re: Scaledown hardware
- From: amonte <ax.mount@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Niall Litchfield" <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 15:14:23 +0200
Sorry for the replies guys, I had a small accident and was in hospital for a
few days.
Niall, yes there are around 30 active users and they do consume around 9
CPUs. This is Siebel, RBO used and 50 table joins so there are queries with
massive consistent gets so CPU usage. The DR Box will support 30% Users,
limited at application level.
Thanks all for your comments, appreciated. Will read them carefully.
Alex
On 9/24/06, Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Do you really mean that 30 active sessions eat 70% of 12 cpus, i.e 9
cpus? And how many concurrently active users would your dr box
support? My best guess it would be most of those 30 wouldn't it? If so
You'd be mad to choose anything other than an identically specced box.
If on the other hand you actually intended 300 concurrent users and
the dr box would only be supporting far fewer then you'd likely get
away with fewer cpus.
On 9/22/06, amonte <ax.mount@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am sizing a server for a database which will be used for disaster
> purposes. It should support 25% of production load.
>
> Right now I have a production server with 12 CPU and 48Gb memory, in
peak
> time 70% of CPU usage is observed (30 Active database users) and 40GB is
> used. This supports 3600 users roughly.
>
> Is this that simple divide my actual HW by 4? i.e 3 CPU and 12 GB to
support
> 1200 users? I think I can do that for memory but not that sure for CPU
> usage.
>
> TIA
>
>
> Alex
>
>
--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.orawin.info
Other related posts:
