RE: STATSPACK - Rollback per transaction %
- From: "Allen, Brandon" <Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <ken.payton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Jared Still" <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:40:16 -0700
Here is the relevant code from statspack.stat_changes, for some reason Outlook
decided to convert it into an attachment the first time I sent it:
begin
. . .
urol := SYSDIF('user rollbacks');
ucom := SYSDIF('user commits');
tran := ucom + urol;
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Payton [mailto:ken.payton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 3:17 PM
To: Jared Still
Cc: Allen, Brandon; bnsarma@xxxxxxxxx; Oracle-L
Subject: Re: STATSPACK - Rollback per transaction %
Sounds correct. The problem seems to be with how statspack is reporting
Rollback per transaction %. Apparently, from Allen's discovery, it
seems statspack is using 'user rollbacks' as opposed to 'transaction
rollbacks' in it's calculation.
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or
attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not
consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and
other information in this message that do not relate to the official business
of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
