We don't have SQLPATH or ORACLE_PATH set in these environments. Not sure
about using sqlcl; it would still require making changes to several
environments. Not something our users are keen on right now.
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@xxxxxxxxx>
I don't have anything with such large lines, so I cannot test, but I have
recently switched to sqlcl, which I find superior to SQL*Plus in many
aspects. Also, what used to be SQLPATH in releases before 12c is now called
ORACLE_PATH. A little bit of additional marketing doesn't hurt, I suppose.
This is what I use for my initialization script:
if [ -t 0 ]; then
stty erase '^?' intr '^C' susp '^Z' quit '^Y' kill '^X' echoe
[ -r $HOME/.aliases ] && source $HOME/.aliases
The beginning if -t 0 is a remnant from an old version of Red Hat which
used to be confused by LD_LIBRARY _PATH set to $ORACLE_HOME/lib and some
GUI tools did not work. As fas as I remember, there was an incompatible
Python library in $ORACLE_HOME/lib, which used to mess up Red Hat GUI.
On 04/13/2017 04:13 PM, Sandra Becker wrote:
Oracle EE 126.96.36.199, 2-node RAC
We recently upgraded from 188.8.131.52 to 184.108.40.206. We have several scripts
running out of crontab to monitor various aspects of our applications. The
analysts are seeing different formatting of the results of these scripts in
12c than they did in 11g.
11g - all output was on one line - linesize set to 1000, only 10 columns,
date, timestamp, and number formats. In the script, they use TO_CHAR to
get the desired format.
12c - no changes to the script; now each column is on a separate line. If
I set linesize to 10000, I see the expect behavior with a whole lot of
whitespace between columns.
I still had copy of this production database that I used to practice the
upgrade. I went in and changed the parameter permit_92_wrap_format to
false. Behavior reverted back to what we saw in 11g. However, I'm not
convinced this is the right workaround.
Has anyone else see this behavior? We have a lot of scripts and changing
all of them to use a column alias and column formatting (which should have
been done in the first place) would be a major undertaking. I haven't
found any bugs on MOS related to this yet or any useful information in the
Oracle docs. My co-worker is opening an SR, but no response yet.
Thank you in advance for any guidance.
Tel: (347) 321-1217