Re: [SPAM] RE: Oracle Zero Data Loss appliance
- From: "Powell, Mark" <mark.powell2@xxxxxxx>
- To: "Mark W. Farnham" <mwf@xxxxxxxx>, "jack@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <jack@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:13:11 +0000
it will be expensive, but that is just an assumption. <<
If it is from Oracle I think that is a pretty safe assumption.
Mark Powell
Database Administration
(313) 592-5148
________________________________
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf
of Jack van Zanen <jack@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2017 7:08:13 PM
To: Mark W. Farnham
Cc: dmann99@xxxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [SPAM] RE: Oracle Zero Data Loss appliance
"There was an assertion on the list that zero data loss was not possible"
I think that was me :-)
My comments were purely for SQL Server technology (logshipping, mirroring and
always on) not for all technologies in the wild.
I do believe zero data loss is possible and also do believe that it will be
expensive, but that is just an assumption.
Regards
Jack van Zanen
[
https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0BwovDucFT1fXaEREVHNWRWZyNjg&export=download]
-------------------------
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole
use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please be
aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any
attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
contact the sender and delete all copies.
Thank you for your cooperation
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Mark W. Farnham
<mwf@xxxxxxxx<
mailto:mwf@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I suggest you contact Axxana directly and ask for a quote.
There was an assertion on the list that zero data loss was not possible. It is
completely possible. Whether it is expensive compared to value is an entirely
different question that should vary by so many factors it is ludicrous to
consider in a vacuum.
As with availability, zero data loss is not, in my opinion, likely to be
economically supportable as a single monolithic solution across all systems at
a given company.
Effectively determining which data and which services are supported at
particular service levels is probably the single biggest cost of operations
control, regardless of technology.
mwf
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[
mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On
Behalf Of David Mann
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2017 9:58 AM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Oracle Zero Data Loss appliance
From: "Mark W. Farnham" <mwf@xxxxxxxx<mailto:mwf@xxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: Oracle Zero Data Loss appliance
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 08:02:25 -0400
Axxana – completely possible.
But at what cost? I've been asked about zero data loss for some medical data
and looked at Far Sync... But knew the customer wanted a solution for $0.00 so
never ended up calling Axxana. Any idea how much one of those boxes goes for?
--
Dave Mann
General Geekery | www.brainio.us<
http://www.brainio.us>
Database Geekery | www.ba6.us<
http://www.ba6.us> | @ba6dotus |
http://www.ba6.us/rss.xml
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
