RE: SAN storage

  • From: "Mercadante, Thomas F (LABOR)" <Thomas.Mercadante@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <p4cldba@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:52:55 -0500

I agree with Andrew.  I worked with EMC and IBM Shark on Sun and both
work just fine.  SAN disk is becoming a commodity.  Cheaper, faster &
better.

________________________________

From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrew Kerber
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 9:49 AM
To: p4cldba@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Oracle List
Subject: Re: SAN storage


There are only three factors, in whatever order is important to you:

-speed, price, and reliability.

I have worked with EMC and Hitachi on Solaris, and been happy with both.


On Feb 5, 2008 5:55 PM, Prasad <p4cldba@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


        All,
        
        I have a Oracle 10gR2 database on Solaris 9 which is going to be
few TB in 6 months time  . and my manager wants me to come up with some
recommendation  for a SAN storage .so Please advise me on what you think
can be a best storage solution
        and also what are the key factors that one should look into
before deciding on which SAN vendors to choose from?
        
        Thanks in Advance
        
        regards
        _Prasad 
        
        




-- 
Andrew W. Kerber

'If at first you dont succeed, dont take up skydiving.' 

Other related posts: