RE: Resetlogs and new incarnation

  • From: "Mark W. Farnham" <mwf@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 13:40:44 -0500

The "instance" number has to do with RAC and a particular set of memory and
processes running on a given database (loosely put, the files).
Without RAC, you'll have exactly one instance (unless you're a dinosaur
running OPS, in which case, eew.)

Are you thinking about the "thread" number in your archive log format
setting (which corresponds to instance)?

On resetlogs, the sequence number of the logs is indeed reset, and the
previously made archived redo logs have nothing to do with your
recovery process of the current files of the database any more, except
perhaps research via logminer on how you got to where you are.

Now you've also used the word "incarnation." In this sense are you talking
about RMAN incarnations? If not, what?

Regards,

mwf

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
Jill.Drocea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 9:04 AM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Jill.Drocea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Resetlogs and new incarnation



I'm using 10g and exercising backups through resetlogs.

Command:

select INSTANCE_NUMBER, INSTANCE_NAME from v$instance;

INSTANCE_NUMBER INSTANCE_NAME
--------------- ----------------
              1 XYZ_SID

I issued point-in-time recovery followed by

alter database open resetlogs;

select INSTANCE_NUMBER, INSTANCE_NAME from v$instance;

INSTANCE_NUMBER INSTANCE_NAME
--------------- ----------------
              1 XYZ_SID

SQL

select SEQUENCE#, resetlogs_change#, resetlogs_time from v$log_history

Shows the sequence# reset to 1 and the sequence number in my archive file
name has been reset to 1. My log_archive_format is set to
xyz_sid_%S_%t_%r.arc. Below you can see that my sequence number was reset.

Xyz_sid_0000000022_1_575652460.arc
Xyz_sid_0000000001_1_578653176.arc


I expected a new instance_number without resetting the sequence number. Is
my assumption correct?


Jill Drocea
Oracle DBA
Verizon Wireless
845-365-7465
Jill.Drocea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


The information contained in this message and any attachment may be
proprietary, confidential, and privileged or subject to the work
product doctrine and thus protected from disclosure.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or
agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please notify me
immediately by replying to this message and deleting it and all
copies and backups thereof.  Thank you.

--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l



--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


Other related posts: