Re[2]: SQL Server vs. Oracle
- From: Jonathan Gennick <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Niall Litchfield <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 21:10:58 -0400
Wednesday, May 12, 2004, 10:45:29 AM, Niall Litchfield
(n-litchfield@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
NL> <quote> For Microsoft SQL Server 2000, the process of
NL> tuning a poorly performing complex SQL Statement is
NL> mostly manual (index tuning being the only exception);
NL> therefore, given the fact that this task will almost
NL> always take a significant and variable period of time,
NL> we feel that 10+ minutes is a fair, conservative
NL> estimate of how long it would take an expert performance
NL> engineer
10 minutes? Only 10 minutes? Wow. I guess I must be far from
being an expert then, because I don't know that I've ever
solved a real-life SQL performance problem in only 10
minutes. Heck,
Best regards,
Jonathan Gennick --- Brighten the corner where you are
http://Gennick.com * 906.387.1698 * mailto:jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxx
Join the Oracle-article list and receive one
article on Oracle technologies per month by
email. To join, visit http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/oracle-article,
or send email to Oracle-article-request@xxxxxxxxxxx and
include the word "subscribe" in either the subject or body.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
