Re: Re: PeteFinnigan.com Oracle advisory for bugs in dbms_scheduler ( alert #68)
- From: Paul Drake <bdbafh@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 22:41:58 -0400
I'll admit, that it is mighty fast on gmail.
yahoo was a dog for oracle-l.
I can now post a hotheaded reply in mere seconds.
whether that is overall a good thing is another matter.
I don't think that I like this top-posting thing, though.
Paul
On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 18:54:48 -0700, Bricklen Anderson <bricklen@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Mladen Gogala wrote:
> > On 09/02/2004 04:16:23 PM, Jonathan Gennick wrote:
> >>Well, the whole world knows now...
> > Given the speed of this list, everybody will apply patch, before
> > they manage to get the email.
> LOL!
> To unsubscribe - mailto:oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx&subject=unsubscribe
> To read recent messages - //freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/09-2004
---
To unsubscribe - mailto:oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx&subject=unsubscribe
To read recent messages - //freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/09-2004
Other related posts:
- » Re: Re: PeteFinnigan.com Oracle advisory for bugs in dbms_scheduler ( alert #68)
