Re: Re: Application of logfiles

  • From: "biti_rainy" <biti_rainy@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:55 +0800

hi,Robert Blok

   i guess the 1536 bytes  bytes archived logs may have no useful=
 redo   , but the   17408 bytes logs    have .

>-rw-rw----    1 oracle   users       17408 2004-04-21 15:40
>robert_log_thread0002_seq0000000029.arc



Best regards

yahoo id: feng_chunpei
A new dba from china

---- from the  mail-----
>Please keep in mind that this is a test.
>I switched logfiles myself. There actually is almost nothing in=
 them,
>because I am the only user on the system and did some switches=
 myself.
>Of course there is always some background redo logging.
>
>As you can see below there is almost no logging in the files=
 (the redo
>files actually are 100M).
>
>-rw-rw----    1 oracle   users        1536 2004-04-21 15:36
>robert_log_thread0001_seq0000000027.arc
>-rw-rw----    1 oracle   users        2560 2004-04-21 15:37
>robert_log_thread0001_seq0000000028.arc
>-rw-rw----    1 oracle   users        2560 2004-04-21 15:37
>robert_log_thread0001_seq0000000029.arc
>-rw-rw----    1 oracle   users        1536 2004-04-21 15:37
>robert_log_thread0002_seq0000000027.arc
>-rw-rw----    1 oracle   users        1536 2004-04-21 15:37
>robert_log_thread0002_seq0000000028.arc
>-rw-rw----    1 oracle   users       17408 2004-04-21 15:40
>robert_log_thread0002_seq0000000029.arc
>-rw-rw----    1 oracle   users       24064 2004-04-21 15:40
>robert_log_thread0001_seq0000000030.arc
>-rw-rw----    1 oracle   users        3584 2004-04-21 15:41
>robert_log_thread0002_seq0000000030.arc
>
>
>biti_rainy wrote:
>> hi,Robert Blok
>> 
>>       thread 2 :
>>       27          2    21-04-2004 15:37:31 21-04-2004=
 15:37:37=3D
>>  YES NO 
>>       28          2     21-04-2004 15:37:37 21-04-2004=
 15:37:43=3D
>>  YES NO
>> ONLY  6 seconds  ,   the  logfile has no redo  
>>        29          2 21-04-2004 15:37:43 21-04-2004 15:40:48=
 YES=3D
>>  YES 
>> there are   3 minutes , how  do you  know the  logfile has no=
 =3D
>>  redo ?
>> maybe some backgroud process  generate redo ?
>> 
>> how  big are  the archived logs   ? they have the same bytes=
 ?
>> 
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------=

>Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
>----------------------------------------------------------------=

>To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
>--
>Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
>FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
>----------------------------------------------------------------=
-
>
>.


=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1



----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts: