RE: RE: interview question on schema design
- From: "Mark W. Farnham" <mwf@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <kylelf@xxxxxxxxx>, <Jay.Miller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 13:28:37 -0500
Sigh. I've never expected carpenters to do a decent job of attaching two
pieces of wood together with screws and a hammer, either.
Creating a schema that serves its functional uses well is an integrated
activity. Neither programmers or schema designers should work in a vacuum.
The legitimate question is whether you can build a better application using
a good schema with two way understanding. I echo Codd in claiming that it is
always true that a better and more robust solution can be built using the
relational model than any other. It might be possible, as with entropy, if
everything is perfect you can get a tie (but as we know it is never true
that everything is perfect.)
mwf
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of kyle Hailey
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 5:57 PM
To: Jay.Miller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: RE: interview question on schema design
While Java programmers and ORM are endless fodder for discussion, the
interesting part for Oracle and relational people here is how would one
create the schema to provide constant time refreshes to something like a
facebook newsfeed page.
And it can't be explained clearly then how would we expect java developers
do produce optimal code?
- Kyle
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
