Re: RE: Partitioning
- From: Kellyn Pot'vin <kellyn.potvin@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "mwf@xxxxxxxx" <mwf@xxxxxxxx>, "roon987@xxxxxxxxxxx" <roon987@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "oratune@xxxxxxxxx" <oratune@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:40:45 -0800 (PST)
Mark,
Zabair is making sure he explains himself clearer.. :)
Kellyn Pot'Vin
Senior Technical Consultant
Enkitec
DBAKevlar.com
RMOUG Director of Training Days 2013
~Tombez sept fois, se relever huit!
________________________________
From: Mark W. Farnham <mwf@xxxxxxxx>
To: roon987@xxxxxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; oratune@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 12:34 PM
Subject: RE: RE: Partitioning
Zabair, are you sitting on your send button?
Holy cow.
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Zabair Ahmed
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 2:27 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; oratune@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: RE: Partitioning
I don't think I explained myself very clearly David. What I hoped for was
say that we have created the new partitioned table (PART TEST2) with the
subpartition template values of USABLE and UNUSABLE for status-name.
Everything is working fine but now the requirement has changed and
status-name will have an additional value of say NONUSABLE.
How could this be handled.
Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
