Re: RAC vote 11gR2 Question
- From: Sanjay Mishra <smishra_97@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Radoulov, Dimitre" <cichomitiko@xxxxxxxxx>, "oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 06:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
Thanks Dimitre for the details. So does it means that having 4 Disks of 512M in
each failure group or One disk of 2G is same in this scenario.
e.g
Failure group 1==> 1disk of 2G or 1G vs 4 disk of 512M
Failure group 2==> 1disk of 2G or 1G vs 4 disk of 512M
Failure group 3==> 1disk of 2G or 1G vs 4 disk of 512M
Trying to understand if multiple disk in Filure group for OCRVote can provide
any additional benefits beside space.
Sanjay
________________________________
From: "Radoulov, Dimitre" <cichomitiko@xxxxxxxxx>
To: smishra_97@xxxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 4:50 AM
Subject: Re: RAC vote 11gR2 Question
> No, it doesn't provide the same availability: with the above configuration
> you can loose up to three disks per failure group
Wrong, sorry. It provides the same availability, but more space. So the
question is do you need the space provided by the 5 disk in that DG.
Dimitre
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
