RE: RAC de-clustering
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:17:13 -0500
Kevin, is correct in that there will be additional overhead incurred
when you run either a RAC database in exclusive or a non-RAC database on
the RAC linked binaries.
That overhead may be acceptable if you want the option of switching back
to using RAC without having to relink the binaries.
-- Mark D Powell --
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kevin Closson
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 3:22 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: RAC de-clustering
>>>
>>>Besides, having Oracle binaries relinked without RAC will not allow
>>>to keep one of 3 database as RAC unless separate Oracle home is used
>>>(poster mentioned that home is on shared FS). So I think that
>>>simplest way is to set cluster_database=FALSE in init.ora/spfile.
at the risk of sounding like a broken record, init.ora settings DO NOT
disable RAC. With clsuter_database=FALSE, the server will still look for
clusterware due to libskgxp.
thread.dead
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
