Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents

  • From: "Ranko Mosic" <ranko.mosic@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: ganstadba@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:12:28 -0500

I wasn't clear what he actually wants at first, how quickly, what for - he
mumbled "checksum", "checksum" - that's why I said identical. Then when he
saw it will take too much work he settled for num_rows.



On 2/22/06, Michael McMullen <ganstadba@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Wasn't the requirement "identical"?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ranko Mosic
> To: tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx
> Cc: ORACLE-L
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 4:54 PM
> Subject: Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
>
>
> Thanks to everybody guys, we can "close" this one.
> My boss settled for simple num_rows from dba_tables.
>
> Appreciate your time & effort.
> Ranko.
>
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>


--
Regards,
Ranko Mosic
Contract Senior Oracle DBA
B. Eng, Oracle 10g, 9i Certified Database Professional
Phone: 416-450-2785
email: mosicr@xxxxxxxxxx
http://ca.geocities.com/mosicr@xxxxxxxxxx/ContractSeniorOracleDBARankoMosicMain.html

Other related posts: