kyle Hailey wrote,on my timestamp of 21/12/2012 4:05 AM: > Postgres looks pretty cool to me. Nothing against Oracle. > And a number of or clients are going Oracle -> Postgres so I'm keenly > interested in the issues and feasibility. We've been using Postgres for all our web-related dbs for years now. Not only is it heaps cheaper than Oracle, it's reached a level nowadays where it is quite usable. Regardless of the perorations of Stonebraker - who has been remarkable silent since his last "take over the Oracle world" crusade fizzled before it even started... - Postgres is a viable alternative. And it actually can interface with Oracle quite well through the HS magic. Not about to move our DW to it but a lot of other smaller stuff is being seriously considered. -- Cheers Nuno Souto in overcast Sydney, Australia dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxx -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l