Re: Question on NEXT_CHANGE#

  • From: Nassyam Basha <nassyambasha@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: Jonathan Lewis <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas P S <royxavier@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 19:12:24 +0530

Jonathan, Thomas



I have picked up SCN from the Log Miner and crosschecked all the SCN
information. As you’ve already guessed, I can see there is no consistency
in the order.  Gaps are not coherent as shown below:

 *Sequence 31 the first_change# is 2432612:*


1) 2432614 then 2432617   - in between 3 are missing

2) 2432623 then 2432626   - in between 3 are missing

3)  2432639 then 2432642  - in between 3 are missing

4) 2432648 then 2432650   - in between 2 are missing

5) 2432663 then 24332665 - in between 1 is missing

It seems that there are interval gaps taken place. I think that, in
between, there are few system changes. Isn’t it?

- Nassyam Basha

Other related posts: