RE: Question about RAC

From: "Freeman, Donald" <dofreeman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ax.mount@xxxxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:33:00 -0500

"hacing 4 instances in each server"
 
You mean hosting 4 instances each on two servers?   Partitioning each
server into 4 virtual servers and then RAC'ing that?   I vote illogical.
It's supposed to be "High Availablity."    How you going to do the
interconnect?   I'm pretty sure this is a "non-standard" configuration
and if support is important to your customer you're not going to want to
do this.  I'm guessing Oracle would laugh at you if you called in for
help on this.
 
 

        -----Original Message-----
        From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of amonte
        Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 1:24 PM
        To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        Subject: Question about RAC
        
        
        Hi all
         
        I have a question about RAC.
         
        I have implemented a few RAC on a couple of customers. I have
always worked with two nodes and a single database, i.e 2 servers and a
common database in a shared storage.
         
        I have a customer who wants to use 2 servers to implement 4
RACs, i.e hacing 4 instances in each server. Has anyone done this sort
of implemntation? I am not sure if this is logical or ilogical :-)
         
         
        Thanks
         
        Alex

RE: Question about RAC

Other related posts: