Attached is the one i had captured for the completed one, but it's in text
only.
I will try to capture the html version next time, Out of curiosity, does
html/flash give some additional information to perform analysis which the
text one won't provide?
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 12:09 AM Laurentiu Oprea <
laurentiu.oprea06@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Do you have the Sql Monitor where execution is completed? (maybe in
html/flash format)
În mie., 23 dec. 2020 la 20:23, Lok P <loknath.73@xxxxxxxxx> a scris:
Table COX has PK on column (EID,BID,OID,ETYP) and table CS has index on
column (EID) and table BOS has index on (BID, OID). But none of the index
is getting used in the query path, is it because the FULL OUTER JOIN cant
use index+ nested loop path here. Is this understanding correct?
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 11:36 PM Lok P <loknath.73@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Forgot to attach the sql monitor which is better formatted.
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 11:31 PM Lok P <loknath.73@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello ,
This database is on version 11.2.0.4 of Oracle Exadata. We have below
query which was running in few seconds , but its now running for
15minutes. No change in execution path happened, but after looking intodetails, we saw its the increase in tempspace spill during HASH JOIN on
plan_line_id - 6 and plan_line_id- 2 causing the query to run longer these
days. During the slow execution most of the time its spending at line no-6
followed by line no- 2 in the execution path with wait event "Direct path
read temp". So wanted to understand , what are the possible way to make
this query run faster?
Users are expecting the query to finish in same time ,within around <30
seconds. But it seems that one of these three table might have the volume
increased slightly more these days so the hash table spilling to temp
multiplying overall execution time for the query.
I see , if i am setting the work area_size_policy to MANUAL and
hash_area_size to 2GB, we can get those execution happened fully in memory
and the query is finishing in ~>15 seconds, but that would be a code change
and also considering this query sometimes executing concurrently from many
sessions(~50+ executions) , so that seems risky as that may eat-up
significant memory.
I doubt that the tempspace consumption may be because of the number of
columns we are exposing out from the table in the query, but i see all of
those are getting fetched and there are no unnecessary column in the
projection list. Again i also was trying to see if i can use some indexed
path + nested loop, but perhaps because of full outer join index hint is
not working too.
Is there any other option we can opt to fix this issue in short term
using some hints(a better path may be) and then may opt for some code
change for long term fix?
*Below is the query and also the sql monitor for same, also attached
the sql monitor as the body was not appearing properly **formatted**
here:-*
SELECT ....~58 columns projected...
FROM (SELECT ....~60 columns projected
FROM "USER1"."BOS" "A2"
FULL OUTER JOIN
(SELECT ...~41 columns projected from A4 and A5
FROM "USER1"."CS" "A4"
FULL OUTER JOIN "USER1"."COX" "A5"
ON "A5"."EID" = "A4"."EID") "A3"
ON "A2"."BI" = "A3"."BID1"
AND "A2"."OID" = TO_NUMBER ("A3"."OID2")) "A1"
WHERE "A1"."BI0" = :b1
OR "A1"."COl1" = :b2
AND "A1"."I_DT" IS NULL
AND ( "A1"."BI0" IS NOT NULL
AND "A1"."CT1" = 'XXX'
OR "A1"."BI0" IS NULL AND "A1"."CT1" = 'YYY')
Global Information
------------------------------
Status : EXECUTING
Instance ID : 1
SQL Execution ID : 16777403
Execution Started : 12/22/2020 10:08:16
First Refresh Time : 12/22/2020 10:08:20
Last Refresh Time : 12/22/2020 10:26:15
Duration : 1080s
Global Stats
==================================================================================
| Elapsed | Cpu | IO | Buffer | Read | Read | Write | Write
| Cell |
| Time(s) | Time(s) | Waits(s) | Gets | Reqs | Bytes | Reqs | Bytes |
Offload |
==================================================================================
| 1124 | 120 | 1004 | 81196 | 808K | 92GB | 7100 | 832MB | -2.04% |
==================================================================================
SQL Plan Monitoring Details (Plan Hash Value=2475526405)
=======================================================================================================================================================================================================================
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Cost | Time |
Start | Execs | Rows | Read | Read | Write | Write | Mem | Temp |
Activity | Activity Detail | Progress |
| | | | (Estim) | | Active(s) | Active
| | (Actual) | Reqs | Bytes | Reqs | Bytes | | | (%) | (#
samples) | |
=======================================================================================================================================================================================================================
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | | | 1
| | | | | | | | | | |
| -> 1 | VIEW | VW_FOJ_0 | 2M | 42883 | 1072
| +8 | 1 | 0 | | | | | | | | |
|
| -> 2 | HASH JOIN FULL OUTER | | 2M | 42883 | 1079
| +2 | 1 | 390K | 147K | 17GB | 2979 | 349MB | 1M | 559M | 17.55 |
Cpu (7) | 8% |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
direct path read temp (180) | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
direct path write temp (2) | |
| 3 | TABLE ACCESS STORAGE FULL | BOS | 1M | 3044 | 1
| +4 | 1 | 1M
| | | | | | | | | |
| 4 | VIEW | | 2M | 16655 | 888 | +8
| 1 | 2M | | | | | | | | | |
| 5 | VIEW | VW_FOJ_1 | 2M | 16655 | 888 | +8
| 1 | 2M | | | | | | | | | |
| 6 | HASH JOIN FULL OUTER | | 2M | 16655 | 892
| +4 | 1 | 2M | 661K | 76GB | 2583 | 303MB | | | 82.45 | Cpu
(56) | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
direct path read temp (829) | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
direct path write temp (3) | |
| 7 | TABLE ACCESS STORAGE FULL | CS | 944K | 2683 | 3
| +4 | 1 | 948K
| | | | | | | | | |
| 8 | TABLE ACCESS STORAGE FULL | COX | 2M | 3213 | 3
| +6 | 1 | 2M
| | | | | | | | | |
=======================================================================================================================================================================================================================
1 - filter(("A3"."BID1"=:B1 OR ("A2"."BI"=:B2 AND "A2"."I_DT" IS NULL
AND (("A3"."BID1" IS NOT NULL AND "A3"."CT3"='XXX') OR
("A3"."BID1" IS
NULL AND "A3"."CT3"='YYY')))))
2 - access("A2"."BI"="A3"."BID1" AND
"A2"."OID"=TO_NUMBER("A3"."OID2"))
6 - access("A5"."EID"="A4"."EID")
