RE: Patch 9.2.07 for Linux
- From: "Marquez, Chris" <cmarquez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:52:03 -0400
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Kevin Closson
>> Now, kudos to anyone that can guess the Oracle's master plan
>> behind not porting 9i to Solx86... I know ...
"STOCK Price" and "sales projections".
A sale of 9i does not indicate growth while a sale of 10g does.
;o)
|| -----Original Message-----
|| From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of M Rafiq
|| evidence can be seen just after release of patchset
|| under known bugs introduce by new patchset.
|| 9206 was the worst example.
Oracle Corp., my co-DBA's, my client, my boss, have to *force* me to change
Oracle versions.
I will gladly run 9205 until some act makes me change it, "new" and "potential
security hole" is not a good enough reason for me to chagne anything.
I would have gladly stayed on 7.3.4.5 and 8.1.7.4 until I was told to get off.
"If it is not broke...don't fix it"
Chris Marquez
Oracle DBA
Other related posts:
