RE: Partitionining perfortmance degraded drastically after upgrading the database from Oracle 102.0.4 to Oracle 11.2.0.3

  • From: "Mandal, Ashoke" <ashoke.k.mandal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: MARK BRINSMEAD <mark.brinsmead@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 18:02:10 +0000

Hello Mark, Originally  PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET value of 6GB was too high. I meant 
to use total memory(MEMORY_TARGET)  of 6GB to manage everything.
Leaving SGA_MAX_SIZE=1G was a typo error. I wanted to set this to 0 so that 
Oracle allocate as needed basis. There is also another thing about this 
upgraded database. We haven’t changed the compatible parameter to to 11.2.0 yet 
and it is still at 10.2.0.

Do you see any negative impact due to the compatible setting as 10.20.0 for the 
11g database?

I will set the SGA_MAX_SIZE to 0 and the compatible to ’11.2.0’ and bounce the 
database and see if that helps the performance.

Thanks,
Ashoke

From: MARK BRINSMEAD [mailto:mark.brinsmead@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 11:20 AM
To: Mandal, Ashoke
Cc: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Partitionining perfortmance degraded drastically after upgrading 
the database from Oracle 102.0.4 to Oracle 11.2.0.3

It rather looks like you have cut your SGA from 6 GB (which may already have 
been rather lean) to 1GB, and reduced the total available memory from 12 GB to 
6GB.
Why are you surprised that this affects performance?  I doubt the problem you 
are encountering has anything to do with Partitioning.  There is probably 
almost NO memory available for buffer cache, and quite likely too little for 
the shared pool, too.  The (more modest) reduction in memory available for the 
PGA may affect execution plans by causing a bias from HASH joins toward NESTED 
LOOPS.
Commonly, people choose (need) to increase the memory available to the SGA when 
upgrading.  At the very least, they will keep memory unchanged.  Slashing the 
memory footprint in half is an uncommon move during an upgrade, and one that 
you will probably want to rethink.
If you want more help here, let's start with some DATA.  Something like the 
"Top-5 Waits" for pre- and post-upgrade might be a good place to start.  After 
that, perhaps execution plans and wait information for the (most) affected 
queries.  Without this, people here can only guess at the actual cause of your 
problem, although if enough of us guess for a long enough time, somebody will 
undoubtedly find the right answer eventually.  (My money is on the changes to 
memory; I suggest we eliminate THAT as a cause before we move on to other 
possibilities, since we KNOW that was changed.)

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Mandal, Ashoke 
<ashoke.k.mandal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ashoke.k.mandal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Greetings All,

I have upgraded one of my 2TB databases with partitioned tables & indexes from 
Oracle 10.2.0.4 to Oracle 11.2.0.3 recently and experiencing severe poor query 
performance. The response time of the queries have increased by 20-25 times.

Before the upgrade to 11g
PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET=6GB
SGA_TARGET=4GB
SGA_MAX_SIZE=6GB

After the upgrade to 11g
MEMORY_TARGET=6GB
PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET=0
SGA_TARGET=0
SGA_MAX_SIZE=1GB

My understanding is that if I set SGA_TARGET and PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET 
parameters to 0 then Oracle manages theses as per the MEMORY_TARGET parameter 
in 11g.
Q. Is it true that the SGA can't grow more than 1GB since SGA_MAX_SIZE is still 
set to 1GB?
Q2. Will the performance improve by setting  SGA_TARGET to 4GB by default?
Q3. Should I also set the PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET to GB as it was prior the 
upgrade?
Q4. Any known issue of partitioning performance impact after you upgrade a 10g 
database to 11g?

Please let me know if you any suggestions to resolve this issue

Appreciate your help in advance,
Ashoke


[CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY NOTICE]

Information transmitted by this email is proprietary to Medtronic and is 
intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and 
may contain information that is private, privileged, confidential or exempt 
from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or 
it appears that this mail has been forwarded to you without proper authority, 
you are notified that any use or dissemination of this information in any 
manner is strictly prohibited. In such cases, please delete this mail from your 
records.

To view this notice in other languages you can either select the following link 
or manually copy and paste the link into the address bar of a web browser: 
http://emaildisclaimer.medtronic.com
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


Other related posts: