Re: Partitioning in 9.2 without ANALYZING tables
- From: "Vikas Gautam" <g_vikas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rjamya@xxxxxxxxx>, <gorbyx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:50:53 -0600
Thanks for the leg pulling, I needed that.
Its legacy in that its an old database that just has had its Oracle RDBMS
version upgraded to keep up with the desupport notice. The tables and the data
is still many moons older. Its also legacy as it does not go to CBO and almost
all tools in the marketplace these days assume you have CBO.
So there.
Vikas
----- Original Message -----
From: rjamya
To: gorbyx@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: Partitioning in 9.2 without ANALYZING tables
Welcome to the 21st Century.
8:)
Raj
On 11/8/05, Alex Gorbachev <gorbyx@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We have a legacy oracle 9.2 database...
Wow! Legacy? Well, we consider it's the only option for really HA
environemnt until at least middle 2006.
--
Best regards,
Alex Gorbachev
Other related posts:
