Re: PX Deq Credit: send blkd

  • From: "Andrew Kerber" <andrew.kerber@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: usn@xxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:18:59 -0500

It sounds like to me you are reading fasting than you are writing, which
would be a normal state.

On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Martin Klier <usn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Riyaj Shamsudeen schrieb:
> > Martin
> >  As you correctly pointed out, PX slaved are blocked.
> >  One obvious reason I can think is smaller large pool. What is your
> > large pool size set to ? Do you use ASMM - Automatic Shared memory
> > management stuff? If yes, do you see any growth or shrink for large pool
> > ? If large pool is not configured, it is possible that shared pool
> > fragmentation to cause PX slaves to wait for these PX events. v$sgastat
> > is a good place to start.
>
> Uh, the large pool approach sounds cool, I will check this ASAP.
>
> What I did so far:
>
> The SGA autotuning features are enabled (SGA_TARGET set), and
> shared_pool_size has been set to zero. I've added up the shared pool
> bytes from v$sgastat, and I ended up with about 120MB.
>
> Since RAM is no problem on this box, I changed SHARED_POOL_SIZE manually
>  to 512MB recently (what, of course did not change anything for the
> running query described above. Yes, it's still running...). Why 512MB? I
> followed
>
> http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14237/initparams197.htm#CHDGGAIB
>
> >   What other events do you in statspack report or AWR report during that
> > time frame?
> Nothing that really matters, I just can't access the system at the
> moment, if important I'd have to post that on monday.
>
> Thanks so far,
> Martin
> --
> Usn's IT Blog for Linux, Oracle, Asterisk
> http://www.usn-it.de
>
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>


-- 
Andrew W. Kerber

'If at first you dont succeed, dont take up skydiving.'

Other related posts: