Re: PARALLEL_MAX_SERVERS value
- From: Andrew Kerber <andrew.kerber@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: LS Cheng <exriscer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:10:25 -0500
I have seen this problem before. I had an instances with processes set to
1000, and parallel_max_servers defaulted to 985. I am not sure how I was
supposed to put enough users on. I manually set the number down to
something more reasonable (256 I think).
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:41 AM, LS Cheng <exriscer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You got it, I always set 2 to 4 as well but never more than 4 so when this
> guy came to me with the 10xCPU number because he got it from oracle
> documentation I was like who earth set to 10xCPU and therefore my post.
>
> The funny thing is while researching this in MOS i saw another note which
> suggests 10xCPU
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> LSC
>
>
--
Andrew W. Kerber
'If at first you dont succeed, dont take up skydiving.'
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
