Re: Oracle vs sybase
- From: Mario Broodbakker <mbroodbakker@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
They did rewrite about everything overtime but concept like user mode
scheduling that Sybase does, is still there, and pretty well developed. Oracle
did an attempt in one of the first 10gR1 patchsets on Windows (x64,IA64) I
think, but it doesn't come close to what SQL Server does...
Mario
----- Original Message ----
From: Kevin Closson <kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 12:01:02 PM
Subject: RE: Oracle vs sybase
If MSFT is being honest, they claim there is no remaining Sybase code in SQL
Server 2005. FWIW.
There may not be anything recent on Sybase, but maybe if you searched for
comparisons between Oracle and MS SQL Server you might have better luck. MS SQL
is based on an earlier version of Sybase, but I believe that since then, both
have independently added row-level locking, which Oracle had long ago.
Dennis Williams
Other related posts:
