I hope they're not public (scarce IPv4) addresses...
Phil
On 4 Nov 2015, at 23:04, Woody McKay <woody.mckay@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Angelo,
Thanks for the thoughts. This project will use 12.1.0.2 + Oct CPU patches
for DB and OJVM.
Yeah, nightly backups will be an issue. I've recommended thinking about a
hardware solution. One thought was something like a 3 disk mirror and just
snapping off a disk each night. This issue is still being debated.
Will for sure do the pros and cons and present.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 3:33 PM, angelo <angelolistas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello Woody,
Oel and multitenant sounds good, with 12c
By the way, on this project will they use 12c or 11g ?
About Windows, what about the cpu, I think it will stuck...
let´s enumerate the cons, not the pros..
=> would be hard to manage..
=> Could they imagine how to do an backup of all these databases ? Or
running an export ? What do they do when the database grows? multiply by
96
=> 96 IPs makes things very complicated.. you will need a class C range to
attend them.
Well, my sugestion, do a annotation of all pros and cons..and show them
Good luck with this project
regards
angelo
On 4 November 2015 at 17:29, Woody McKay <woody.mckay@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Angelo,
Yes it is a stand alone. Actually it will be leased through RackSpace.
They are helping with the design and will be with the hosting team for the
day-to-day support.
They are also talking about switching to OEL and multi-tenant in a year or
two. But, stuck with Windoz for now...
As an update, some on the list will remember my question a couple of weeks
ago on listeners. I was able to convince them to go with one listener per
SID. But, instead of 96 ports, they want to use 96 IP's. I checked with
Oracle support and they said as long as the IP:Port combo was unique that
they would support it.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 1:45 PM, angelo <angelolistas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
My opinion.. They are crazy...
So many instances on the same server, Windows server .. (is it stand
alone ?)
On 4 November 2015 at 16:40, Woody McKay <woody.mckay@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
Our hosting unit is designing a large server and want to put about 96
SID's on it. They've worked through I/O and RAM considerations. This is
on Win 64 2012 R2.
However, they are not sure about cpu/core count and usage. They
currently have 64 cores and need to know how many of the cores will each
SID (oracle.exe) can/will use. If a SID can't use all cores, then what's
the best way to spread the SIDs across all the cores. I talked about cpu
groups, but they said that Oracle always picks cpu group 0 on startup and
they have to manually reassign the groups to each oracle.exe process.
I've only had about 40 SIDs on a box with 24 cores, so I don't really
have the experience to provide the best answers.
Any thoughts? Thanks
--
Sincerely,
WoodyMcKay
--
Sincerely,
WoodyMcKay
--
Sincerely,
WoodyMcKay