RE: Oracle Security Alert for CVE-2012-1675 - 10g extended support
- From: "Allen, Brandon" <Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "development@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <development@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 20:14:34 +0000
The main advantages I was thinking of with DYNAMIC_REGISTRATION_LISTENER=OFF
vs. SECURE_REGISTER_LISTENER=(IPC) is that setting DRL=OFF can be done without
any downtime at all, while setting SRL=IPC requires a brief outage while the
listener is restarted. I also like the fact that all the config changes are in
one place (the listener.ora), vs. the having to update LOCAL_LISTENER in all
the database instances to use IPC. I would document the requirement for static
registration in the database-specific documentation so DBAs should be aware of
it and if not, they should figure it out pretty quickly during initial testing
of a new database so I'm not too concerned about that. The same thing could be
said for using SRL=IPC - if the DBA doesn't remember to configure
local_listener to use IPC on a new database, then users won't be able to
connect either.
Regards,
Brandon
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Martin Bach
just wondering - is there a reason for those on the list to turn off dynamic
registration of listeners in single instance
________________________________
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or
attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not
consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and
other information in this message that do not relate to the official business
of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
