Re: Oracle Says Customers Should Draw Their Own Conclusions on Itanium
- From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: kamusis@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 10:51:28 +0100
Disclosure to the court puts them in the public domain. I'm interested to
know whether the court also maintains a complete list of disclosed docs
from both sides (rather than edited highlights). From where I'm standing
Oracle's list is worse than trying to judge a trial based on newspaper
reports because of the obvious bias.
hmm - I didn't intend to describe Oracle as worse than News International
but...
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Leyi Kamus Zhang <kamusis@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Is this legal? publish the highly confidential internal mails to the
> public?
>
> --
> Kamus <kamusis@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Visit my blog for more : http://www.dbform.com
> Join ACOUG: http://www.acoug.org
>
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Greg Rahn <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > I'm not taking sides, but probably worth a read.
> > http://www.oracle.com/itanium
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Greg Rahn | blog <http://bit.ly/u9N0i8> | twitter <
> http://bit.ly/v733dJ> |
> > linkedin <http://linkd.in/gregrahn>
> >
> >
> > --
> > //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
> >
> >
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.orawin.info
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
