Re: Oracle SAN implementation
- From: Web Stalkers <webstalkers@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: stant_98@xxxxxxxxx, "oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:50:06 -0700
I would say that RAW is more likely if you are looking at RAC and
barring RAC, RAW Oracle would be in the minority even on SAN's.
That's just my opinion based on my wrok experience and conversations
with other DBA's.
Stephen
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 18:22:10 +0200, Carel-Jan Engel
<cjpengel.dbalert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Start here:
> www.baarf.com
>
> Especially: 'Sane San', bij James Morle, 'Is Raid 5 Really a bargain',
> by Cary Millsap, and many more.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Carel-Jan Engel
>
> ===
> If you think education is expensive, try ignorance. (Derek Bok)
> ===
>
>
>
> On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 17:50, Alex wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I just got a new job as prod. dba on a contract. One of the things I am
> > going to have to research is how to implement Oracle db on SAN. I
> > understand that SAN is frequently used in RAC env. Currently we have Oracle
> > 9.2.0.5 primary and standby instances setup in a Data Guard configuration.
> > Can someone point out some documents, links or papers regarding Oracle/SAN
> > implementation for Windows platforms.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!
> >
> > --
> > //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
>
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
--
Stephen Andert
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
